Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
State Solution
(Type of Activity: Policy/Regulation )

The state should build a unified, easy-to-navigate system for producing, standardizing, and sharing local GHG and energy data. This would include: A centralized statewide energy and GHG data portal—potentially by expanding existing platforms like the UCLA Energy Atlas to serve all regions and remain up to date, and by restoring free access to key tools such as ICLEI ClearPath for local jurisdictions. Standardized GHG inventory methods, timelines, and indicators statewide, ensuring that all jurisdictions work from consistent, comparable (“apples-to-apples”) data. Regularly produced and published local GHG inventories for every city and county, updated on a predictable statewide cycle to reduce duplication, support regional planning, and inform state policy.

Existing Examples of Progress: 1. Given the very high interest in a state-led process to conduct local GHG inventories , an effort was made in 2023 to propose State legislation that would allocate budget to CARB to produce local GHG inventories for local governments (SB-511), which was suspended after receiving an estimated total cost of $18 million from the Department of Finance. 2. Local government participants expressed that they are aware of many other data portals led by the State designed to provide data to local governments
Region: San Francisco Bay Area, Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Local Solution
(Type of Activity: Policy/Planning/Land Use )

CAPs as Flexible, Living Frameworks. Jurisdictions can treat CAPs as adaptable frameworks, using iterative updates or living appendices to incorporate new data and science between major revisions, enabling policy adoption and implementation to proceed without waiting for perfect or complete inventories.

Region: Inland Deserts, Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Local Solution
(Type of Activity: Community Program Implementation )

Regional Collaboration on Inventory-Grade Data. Local governments can work through counties, COGs, MPOs, regional climate authorities, and university partners to jointly generate or validate GHG and transportation emissions data. These partnerships reduce duplication, shorten timelines, and help translate complex datasets so smaller jurisdictions can apply inventory-grade data in practice.

Region: Inland Deserts, Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
State Solution
(Type of Activity: Policy/Regulation )

Enhance public access and coordination of climate data resources. Integrate and streamline climate data tools across universities and agencies, ensuring key datasets are updated frequently and made easily accessible to support local planning and decision-making.

Existing Examples of Progress: Cal-Adapt follows the global climate data cycle—updated roughly every 5–6 years—and that the state is developing evolving tools like the Vulnerable Communities Platform to “add new information as it’s available” and help planners align to the latest assessment data
Region: Inland Deserts, Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Local Solution
(Type of Activity: Policy/Planning/Land Use )

A shared, centralized approach to GHG inventory production and data access should be established so that cities no longer need to recreate their own inventories. Inventory datasets should be compiled and transparently shared—whether by the state, counties, regional agencies, academic institutions, nonprofits, or consultants—using standardized methods and timelines to ensure consistency and reduce duplication.

Existing Examples of Progress: 1. A partnership between UC Berkeley (led by Chris Jones) and StopWaste is developing a simplified tool to prepare inventories to local jurisdictions at little to no cost. It includes equity indicators and will soon feature policy recommendation tools. Beta testing begins in February 2025, with walkthroughs and focus groups in March. 2. County-produced inventories are happening informally in some places, demonstrating a model to scale statewide. 3. UC Irvine is funded to inventory climate action plans and GHG inventories.
Region: San Francisco Bay Area, Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Challenge

Utilities, state agencies, and regional entities hold the energy-use data needed for GHG inventories, but CPUC privacy rules, inconsistent release practices, lack of standardization, and poor interagency coordination make it extremely difficult for cities to obtain complete datasets. As a result, each local government must navigate a lengthy, months-long utility data request process and often pay consultants to recreate data that already exists, all without a centralized portal or clear access point.

Region: San Francisco Bay Area, Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
State Solution
(Type of Activity: Program Implementation and Outreach )

Targeted technical assistance and training on GHG data and inventories. State agencies described providing technical assistance, training, and hands-on support to help local governments understand methodologies, process raw data, and complete inventories. This assistance is positioned as ongoing support rather than one-time guidance.

Region: Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Local Solution
(Type of Activity: Policy/Planning/Land Use )

Developing locally supplemented inventories when official data is delayed. Cities and counties generate or supplement GHG inventories using consultants, volunteers, or regional estimates when state or utility data is slow to arrive. These inventories are used as interim planning tools and updated as improved data becomes available.

Region: Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Local Solution
(Type of Activity: Policy/Planning/Land Use )

Narrowing inventory scope to priority sectors. Some jurisdictions limit inventory efforts to major emissions sectors, such as buildings or transportation, to reduce technical burden and speed updates. This allows planning work to continue despite incomplete data in other sectors.

Region: Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Challenge

Frequent Methodological Changes Trigger Repeated Inventory Revisions. Changes in emissions factors, electricity supply assumptions, or transportation accounting methods require jurisdictions to repeatedly redo GHG inventories, even when underlying local activity has not changed.

Region: Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Challenge

Misalignment Between Data Delivery Timelines and Inventory Cycles. Utility and transportation data frequently arrive too late to align with CAP update schedules, grant deadlines, or reporting cycles, forcing jurisdictions to revise inventories multiple times or rely on outdated inputs.

Region: Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Challenge

Raw State GHG Data Requires Specialized Processing. When CARB or other state entities provide emissions-related datasets, the data is often delivered in raw or technical formats that require advanced expertise to convert into usable GHG inventories. This creates a bottleneck for jurisdictions without in-house data analysts.

Region: Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Challenge

Inconsistent and Outdated VMT Data for Emissions Accounting. Jurisdictions rely on VMT estimates that are often outdated, regionally inconsistent, or based on unclear methodologies, making them unreliable for transportation emissions inventories. Many local governments lack the technical capacity or funding to independently generate inventory-grade transportation data.

Region: Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
State Solution
(Type of Activity: Policy/Regulation )

Align State Agency Policies and Correct Interagency Misalignment: State should resolve contradictions between agencies (CEC, CPUC, CARB, counties, CCAs) to streamline data access.

Region: San Francisco Bay Area
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
State Solution
(Type of Activity: Policy/Regulation )

Address CPUC Data Privacy Rules That Restrict Access to Utility Data: Participants explicitly identify CPUC privacy rules as blocking access to GHG-relevant energy-use data.

Region: San Francisco Bay Area
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Challenge

Jurisdictions want additional metrics—such as social cohesion, valuation indicators, or co-benefit measures—but cannot produce these without state-level support for new data development and methodologies.

Region: San Francisco Bay Area
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Challenge

Local jurisdictions often do not know which academic or state-led efforts are producing inventories, and data updates are released on multi-year cycles, preventing timely tracking of progress and forcing cities to redo work unnecessarily.

Region: San Francisco Bay Area
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
State Solution
(Type of Activity: Policy/Regulation )

More regular and available alternatives to VMT data that works well for both baseline calculations and projections. And backing from the state that those data sources are best available to help protect from any legal action that agencies could face when they shift away from using VMT data.

Region: Statewide
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Challenge

Local governments struggle to keep pace with evolving climate data and assessments when their planning documents—like general plans and zoning codes—are only updated once every few decades.

Region: Inland Deserts
Priority Area: Climate Action
|
Barrier: Source Data
|

Challenge/Local/State

Description
Best Practice
UCLA’s Energy Atlas partners with Regional Energy Networks to Provide Access to Energy Data

The Bay Area Energy Atlas—one of the nation’s most comprehensive energy tools—has been revamped with new features, expanded data, and a more user-friendly interface. Developed by UCLA in partnership with BayREN, the Atlas helps users explore regional energy use through interactive maps and detailed building data. From policymakers to curious residents, anyone can now dive deeper into energy trends by city, building type, or time period. New tools make it easier to compare communities and visualize consumption with monthly data through 2021.

https://lnkd.in/gYtNyeAg

Region: San Francisco Bay Area, Statewide

Help us strengthen our knowledge base!

Help us to expand this database. Either share new ideas, best practices or general feedback via this form, or click on a particular item to share additional feedback, information, examples of progress on that particular item.

Use these filters to drill down on priority areas, barriers, challenge or solution type, and/or regions.
Filters
Topic Areas
Reset
Barriers
Reset
Type
Reset
Region
Reset