The SLECC Priority Area Pages are in a Beta Test version. We welcome all feedback using either the survey link below or by clicking on any of the key challenges or potential solutions to provide comments on an individual item!

What is the Clean Energy Transition?

The clean energy transition refers to the shift from fossil fuel-based energy systems (coal, oil, natural gas) to renewable and low-carbon energy sources like solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal, and energy storage technologies. This transformation involves changes in how we generate, distribute, store, and consume energy across all sectors—electricity, transportation, heating, and industrial processes. 

California’s clean energy transition is crucial for meeting both local and state goals. The current energy system emits greenhouse gases and causes other environmental impacts including air, water, and soil pollution. Participants in SLECC engagements prioritized expanding local renewable energy and building decarbonization. 

The State has committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 and reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, targets that have been similarly set by over 250 local governments. The clean energy transition is fundamental to these targets, as the electricity sector represents a major source of emissions that can be effectively decarbonized through renewable energy deployment. With advances in storage technology and grid modernization, renewable energy increasingly provides reliable power while protecting against price volatility. The transition also supports California’s goal of maintaining economic leadership while reducing emissions. Clean energy industries create local jobs, attract investment into regions, and position the state as a global leader in emerging technologies like battery storage, electric vehicles, and smart grid systems. Clean energy development helps reduce local air pollution, particularly in disadvantaged communities, directly improving community health outcomes and addressing environmental justice concerns. Further, State and local government entities and utilities can achieve direct and long term operational savings by implementing clean and distributed energy resources on their facilities, which supports affordability for both taxpayers and ratepayers. 

What future are we working towards?

State and local participants envision an integrated, distributed, and flexible future energy system that offers zero emission, reliable, and affordable power for all and is implemented by a knowledgeable workforce and just transition. 

Which State Agencies are working on this issue?

This priority area is relevant to the function of:

  • California Energy Commission
  • California Public Utilities Commission
  • California Air Resources Board
  • Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development
  • California Independent System Operator
  • California Environmental Protection Agency
  • California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
  • Strategic Growth Council
  • Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation.

What’s already working?

California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requiring 60% renewable electricity by 2030 has driven massive renewable deployment. The state’s cap-and-trade program provides market incentives for emissions reductions, while building codes increasingly mandate solar installations and energy efficiency. Large solar and wind projects have dramatically reduced costs through economies of scale. California now regularly achieves periods where renewables meet 100% of electricity demand during peak production hours. Aggressive storage mandates and declining battery costs have made California a global leader in grid-scale energy storage, helping solve renewable intermittency challenges. 

The federal Inflation Reduction Act, before being dismantled, catalyzed significant investment and tax credits to support grid modernization, domestic solar manufacturing, solar access, home energy rebates, etc.   

Local-level leadership has advanced progress in the State’s clean energy transition, propelled by a strong sense of urgency and importance in many regions. Initial CPUC investment in local government partnerships two decades ago supported energy and climate capacity at the local level. Since then, enormous progress is being made through community choice aggregation (CCA) programs and municipal utilities that purchase cleaner electricity for utility customers at lower rates, Regional Energy Networks that are transforming the market for efficiency and distributed energy resources, municipal building codes that exceed state standards, innovative solar financing and energy efficiency programs, and municipal solar and efficiency installations. Recent regional technical assistance programs support locally led clean energy progress. Local workforce and job training programs are building the market capacity to continue addressing clean energy in buildings. Local plans are engaging community stakeholders deeply to achieve community benefits alongside aggressive energy targets.  Participants highlighted major progress in recent years in the development of wind, solar, and storage. Some regions, like the Inland Empire, emphasize their potential to implement much more, while others, like the Bay Area are more constrained and are looking at infill project opportunities.

What’s keeping us from getting there and how do we overcome these barriers?

To achieve the desired future outlined above, California will need to accelerate climate action across CA. Participants share that several key barriers impede progress and require further attention, as detailed below:  Interconnection & Energization Processes, Grid Infrastructure, Investment Decisions, Funding, Siting & Permitting, Supply Chain, Assistance Coordination, Residential Decarbonization & Affordability, Workforce, Data Access, Codes & Standards, Community Microgrid Deployment and Utility Structure. On the left, toggle through these barriers to view details about challenges experienced across the state and solution opportunities at the state and local level.

  • null

    Barrier 1: Interconnection and Energization Processes

    Transitioning vehicles and buildings to clean electricity is challenging due to electrical capacity constraints, delayed load studies, long interconnection and energization queues, and process inconsistency managed by the utilities.

  • null

    Barrier 2: Grid Infrastructure

    Insufficient and aging infrastructure (e.g. battery storage, smart grid, transmission) cannot adequately support or optimize growing energy demand (e.g EVs, VPPs, AI, data centers, housing), the rapid transition to renewables, abundant day-time energy, and reliability as climate impacts increase.

  • null

    Barrier 3: Investment Decisions

    Despite state goals related to distributed, localized energy resources, investments, regulatory decisions, and policies often discourage or hamstring clean energy deployment or favor centralized utility infrastructure.

  • null

    Barrier 4: Funding

    Lack of sufficient, accessible, flexible, and reliably recurring funding/financing to support widespread implementation of place-based clean energy projects and decarbonization.

  • null

    Barrier 5: Siting & Permiting

    Siting, planning, and deciding on utility-scale energy infrastructure projects lacks transparency and alignment with societal needs, and faces community resistance in some areas, often those most remote.

  • null

    Barrier 6: Supply Chain

    Global dependencies and geopolitical risks slows progress towards clean energy goals.

  • null

    Barrier 7: Assistance Coordination

    Lack of coordinated systems, compounded by fragmented programs, language barriers, and community mistrust, prevents households from accessing or trusting home decarbonization assistance.

  • null

    Barrier 8: Residential Decarbonization & Affordability

    Residential energy bills are increasing, making electrification initiatives more difficult, and CA lacks a coordinated strategy to address the root issues of system costs that impact the trajectory of rates while protecting energy efficiency programs that help lower customer costs.

  • null

    Barrier 9: Workforce

    The market of qualified workers necessary to construct and install clean energy projects and retrofits is not large enough, especially outside of major urban centers.

  • null

    Barrier 10: Data Access

    California lacks consistent access to data about consumption, energy supply infrastructure, and other information that can inform CAPs, capital projects, and cost affordability impact analyses.

  • null

    Barrier 11: Codes & Standards

    While California has one of the nation’s strongest statewide energy codes, weak enforcement and limited local capacity undermine its impact. Efforts to go further through local reach codes can be highly political and result in legal challenges, and are now constrained by a legislated moratorium.

  • null

    Barrier 12: Community Microgrid Deployment

    Community-scale microgrids remain financially and technically difficult to deploy due to restrictive utility rules, undervaluation of battery reserves, and high coordination needs for EV fleets and other DERs. These challenges, compounded by PSPS outages and slow permitting, prevent microgrids from delivering reliable and cost-effective community resilience.

  • null

    Barrier 13: Utility Structure

    Investor-owned utilities’ concentrated control over energy infrastructure limits public power and community solutions, creating legal and procedural hurdles for municipalization and keeping many projects unnecessarily under utility purview.

Local Solution Spotlight

Help us strengthen our knowledge base!

Help us to expand our database. Either share new ideas, best practices or general feedback via this form, or click on a particular item to share additional feedback, information, examples of progress on that particular item.

Additional Resources

Please share any additional resources you would like to include by emailing eecoordinator@civicwell.org.