The ability for local community serving organizations to plan and implement energy, climate, and land use efforts that can help communities thrive and avoid the worst impacts of climate change depends intrinsically on the availability of investments and assistance, which is often made available from state and federal agencies and others in the form of grants and technical assistance. What emerges from almost every constructive conversation with hundreds of locals across priority areas is the fundamental need to deploy available assistance in a way that is more accessible, flexible, and reliable.  

A report titled “Better Funding,” published in 2024 synthesized and catalogued themes gathered over years of active input generously given by community-serving practitioners regarding funding access and deployment.  It suggests California take stock of lessons learned from recent federal and state windfalls to reimagine and reform funding deployment before the next big infusion. It also suggests ways State and federal agencies can better deploy the dollars needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change including nearly 70 ideas for way that State and federal agencies can tune up traditional funding vehicles, largely comprised of competitive grants. These ideas cover different stages of the grantmaking process and range from basic to bold, such as streamlining program design engagement, simplifying applications, and options for more effective technical assistance. To unlock local and tribal potential at the scale and speed needed, and with minimal burden, the report proposes piloting a new, potentially ideal approach to funding deployment. This approach pairs a State-led funding queue (Investible Climate Communities) with regional-based engagement and project scoping support (California Regional Energy and Climate Hubs (REACH)).

In 2025, the availability of publicly subsidized assistance is dramatically contracting due to the policies of the new federal administration and budgetary deficits within CA. There are a myriad of policy movements that are already in play or that could be proposed in CA that could either create and sustain or, sadly, damage and dismantle in-State climate funding sources.    

What’s Working

There are currently billions of dollars that have been statutorily dedicated to energy, climate and land use funding and technical assistance programs in California. The largest and most recurring sources are from the 1) CPUC’s Public Purpose Charge, a small surcharge on California ratepayer bills that is used to subsidize energy efficiency and other programs (~$2B/year) and 2) Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which uses cap and trade auction proceeds to fund emission reduction efforts, including over 100 programs through the California Climate Investments programs overseen by CARB (~$4B/year).  In budget surplus years, policymakers also dedicated additional dollars to climate efforts like a new CEC’s Equitable Building Decarbonization program.  In 2024, legislators adopted XX which led to voter approval of Proposition 4, a one-time “Climate Bond,” which will infuse $10 billion over X years for climate projects, including up to .  Given the changes in federal investments, retaining these sources are critical, but decisions being made at the executive and legislative level are placing each of the investments at risk. 

At the 2025 CCEC Forum, opening plenary speakers and poll respondents shared positive progress resulting from strong federal and state investments in the last few years including on electric vehicle infrastructure, heat pumps, and reach codes. State and local participants regularly share that a key co-benefit and lesson from good investments years is the power of collaboration. Many of the grants in the last few years encouraged regional and collaborative approaches, and organizations are working to sustain and strengthen collaborative models and connections. The Regional Climate Collaboratives program awarded in 202X funded funding and technical assistance capacity.  And while implementation continues to lag, a great deal of progress has been made in plans that are inclusive and integrate science. Participants also shared that funding did support new capacity, including in rural, hard-to-reach and disadvantaged communities.  

There are efforts within agencies to streamline funding deployment and improve technical assistance. For example, at SGC, staff have created a technical assistance toolkit for agencies and are evaluating program guidelines and process for especially challenging competitive grants like the Transformative Climate Communities, which received funding via the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and Prop 4. There are many other examples of funding deployment innovations and best practices in Better Funding. 

Over 60 cross-sector proponents of accessible assistance deployment have come together informally through the “Statewide Funding Solutions Workgroup,” which meets bi-monthly to explore relevant models, research, and policy pathways that can steward bold transformation of funding deployment in CA. 

Barriers & Solutions

To achieve the desired future outlined above, California will need to accelerate climate action across CA. Participants share that several key barriers impede progress and require further attention, as detailed below: Insufficient Investment, Unstable Assistance, State & Federal Funding Priorities, Application Burden & Accessibility, Political, Economic & Structural Risks and Capacity Building. On the left, toggle through these barriers to view details about challenges experienced across the state and solution opportunities at the state and local level.

Help us strengthen our knowledge base!

Help us to expand our database. Either share new ideas, best practices or general feedback via this form, or click on a particular item to share additional feedback, information, examples of progress on that particular item.

Additional Resources

Please share any additional resources you would like to include by emailing eecoordinator@civicwell.org.