Design simplified local programs with easy access to funding.
The ability for local community serving organizations to plan and implement energy, climate, and land use efforts that can help communities thrive and avoid the worst impacts of climate change depends intrinsically on the availability of investments and assistance, which is often made available from state and federal agencies and others in the form of grants and technical assistance. What emerges from almost every constructive conversation with hundreds of locals across priority areas is the fundamental need to deploy available assistance in a way that is more accessible, flexible, and reliable.
A report titled “Better Funding,” published in 2024 synthesized and catalogued themes gathered over years of active input generously given by community-serving practitioners regarding funding access and deployment. It suggests California take stock of lessons learned from recent federal and state windfalls to reimagine and reform funding deployment before the next big infusion. It also suggests ways State and federal agencies can better deploy the dollars needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change including nearly 70 ideas for way that State and federal agencies can tune up traditional funding vehicles, largely comprised of competitive grants. These ideas cover different stages of the grantmaking process and range from basic to bold, such as streamlining program design engagement, simplifying applications, and options for more effective technical assistance. To unlock local and tribal potential at the scale and speed needed, and with minimal burden, the report proposes piloting a new, potentially ideal approach to funding deployment. This approach pairs a State-led funding queue (Investible Climate Communities) with regional-based engagement and project scoping support (California Regional Energy and Climate Hubs (REACH)).
In 2025, the availability of publicly subsidized assistance is dramatically contracting due to the policies of the new federal administration and budgetary deficits within CA. There are a myriad of policy movements that are already in play or that could be proposed in CA that could either create and sustain or, sadly, damage and dismantle in-State climate funding sources.

